Legal Opinion
Gaul v. Baker
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 18, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
This is an action of ejectment. The defendant Baker pleaded in abatement, among other grounds stated, that he was a nonresident and that no personal service had been made on him nor had any property belonging to him in this State been attached, and these facts were admitted in the answer to the plea. When the action was instituted notice of its pendency was ordered to be given to Baker by registered mail, in accordance with the provisions of §5599 of the General Statutes, and this order was complied with. Subsequently another like order was made and complied with, and the case was ordered…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Cahill v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Gaul v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Harris v. WeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mendrochowicz v. WolfeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- State v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Burns v. AllenMississippi Supreme Court · 1947
- State v. ClarkConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969
- State v. FayConnecticut Appellate Court · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.