Burns v. Allen
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Alexander, J.,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court.
Allen brought suit in ejectment against Burns and procured judgment by default. Error is assigned that tbe summons, although served personally upon Burns, did not comply with asserted requirements of Code 1942, Section 789, which state that in ejectment cases “ Declarations, writs, and pleas in tbe form or to tbe effect of tbe precedents appended .hereto, shall be good and sufficient for all purposes in proceedings under this chapter.’'’ Section 791 provides a form of summons which .adds to the ordinary writ at law, tbe following ££to answer…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Guess v. SmithMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
- Ahlemeyer v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
- Gaul v. BakerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Yost v. AldersonMississippi Supreme Court · 1880
- Field v. JunkinMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- DURHAM, a MINOR, ETC. v. DurhamMississippi Supreme Court · 1956
- Seismic Petroleum Services, Inc. v. RyanMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
- Day v. HamiltonMississippi Supreme Court · 1959
- Timothy Gene Pryer v. Thomas Gardner, IIIMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
- American Compensation Insurance Company v. Hector Ruiz, Doing Business As Los Primoz Construction; Raul Aparacio; Jesco, Incorporated; and Appalachian Underwriters, IncorporatedMississippi Supreme Court · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.