Legal Opinion
Diethelm v. Cavanaugh
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 19, 1984No. C9-83-1694PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal against a mechanics lien claimant, following motions of dismissal granted after presentation of his evidence, and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The trial court, sitting without a jury, found that the appellant had not shown that the pre-lien notice required by Minn. Stat. § 514.011(2) (1980) was given to the owners. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Diethelm was a subcontractor doing excavation, foundation and framing work on new home construction. He did a number of such jobs for one contractor, Homestead…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lesmeister v. DillySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Dolder v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. FitzimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Armco Steel Corp. v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Polivka Logan Designers, Inc. v. EndeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sievert v. LaMarcaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- London Construction Co. v. Roseville Townhomes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. v. WalshCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Niewind v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001