Legal Opinion

Niewind v. Carlson

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 2001No. C0-00-1881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge

Chuck Niewind, d/b/a C & N Construction (Niewind), appeals from the denial of his motion for a new trial or, in the alternative, amended findings of fact on the issue of attorney fees awarded to him in this mechanic’s lien action. By notice of review, respondents Keith L. and Jane Lash Carlson, co-trustees of the Jane Lash Carlson Trust, (Carlsons) appeal from the denial of their motion for summary judgment. Because we conclude that Nie-wind’s prelien notice failed to comply with the requirements of Minn.Stat. § 514.011, subd. 1 (2000), we reverse.

FACTS

Niewind…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morton Buildings, Inc. v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Dolder v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. MERLE'S CONST. CO., INC. v. BergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  4. Armco Steel Corp. v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  5. London Construction Co. v. Roseville Townhomes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fischer v. Colorow Health Care, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API