Legal Opinion
Martin Bros. Box Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 15, 1953No. Civ. No. 6239PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SOLOMON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Martin Brothers Box Company, hereinafter sometimes called “complainant,” filed a petition in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 1336 to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, hereinafter called the “Commission,” dismissing the complaint of the plaintiff in a proceeding brought before the Commission. The United States of America and the Commission have no financial interest in this case but, because of statutory necessity, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2322, they were made parties defendant. Southern Pacific Company, the defendant in the proceeding…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Shippers' Car Supply Committee v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1958
- MacInnis v. Interstate Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1959