Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fash

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 14, 1926No. 16632PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs in the trial court, and the defendant in error was defendant below. Parties will be referred to as they appeared below.

This cause was submitted to the trial court without intervention of the jury, and at the conclusion of the testimony and upon motion .of plaintiff for judgment, the court made the following pronouncement:

“Now the court finds * * * judgment will be for the defendant. Motion for new trial is overruled by the court. To which action of the court plaintiff excepts and moves for time in which to make and serve case-made for the Supreme Court from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lillard v. MeisbergerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Singer v. OoleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Dose v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StevensonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Bouse v. WhitneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Cunningham v. McCraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Ralph v. PetersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Dorchester v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API