Legal Opinion

Moilanen v. Washington Iron Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1913No. Docket No. 43Published

Error to Marquette; Flannigan, J. Case by Aaro Moilanen against the Washington Iron Company for personal injuries. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff was injured while in the employ of the defendant in its mine. He sued, and recovered a judgment for $5,000. The case is brought here by writ of error.

The mine consisted of a single shaft, going down in the ore vein following the dip of the vein, which was at an angle of about 55 degrees. The vein extended north from the shaft, and consisted of a body of ore about 30 feet wide, lying between two well-defined walls, the upper of which was called the hanging, and the lower the foot, wall. Several levels had been driven along the vein from the shaft, overlying each other about 50…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Merkle v. Township of BenningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Stone v. CovellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Scendar v. Winona Copper Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Hunter v. Township of DwightMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Plumb v. Hecla Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API