Legal Opinion

Plumb v. Hecla Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1909No. Docket No. 79PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Bay; Collins, J. Case by Edward Plumb against the Hecla Company and another for personal injuries. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant Hecla Company on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

This was an action by plaintiff against the Hecla Company, impleaded with the Hecla Belt Line Railroad Company, defendants, for damages for personal injuries received on account of claimed negligence of defendants. Defendants offered no evidence, but at the close of plaintiff’s case asked the court to instruct a verdict in their behalf, and in behalf of each of them for several reasons, which will be considered later. This motion was denied, and defendant makes such denial the basis of its principal assignment of error. Plaintiff recovered a substantial judgment against defendant Hecla…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wanner v. MearsMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moilanen v. Washington Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Township of Rockland v. OxnamMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API