Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 17, 2009No. 06-56649PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
We respectfully ask the California Supreme Court to exercise its discretion to accept and decide the certified questions below, pursuant to California Rule of Court 8.548.
I. Statement of Facts and Procedural Background
Defendant Oracle Corporation (“Oracle”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in California. Plaintiffs are “Instructors” — to use Oracle’s term — who trained customers to use Oracle software. The parties stipulated in federal district court that from April 1999 to June 2006 (the date of the stipulation) Oracle “utilized Instructors on a contract…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burnside v. Kiewit Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. BradshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- California School of Culinary Arts v. LujanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Campbell v. Arco Marine, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Wells Fargo Home Mortg. Overtime Pay Lit.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.California Supreme Court · 2011
- Sullivan v. Oracle Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Jimenez v. Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2010
- Todd Frealy v. Rick ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.