Legal Opinion

Freeman v. City of Montgomery

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided May 27, 1952No. 3 Div. 948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Presiding Judge.

This prosecution is based on a violation of a city ordinance. Upon conviction in the recorder’s court, the accused took an appeal to the circuit court. The instant appeal follows a judgment of conviction in the latter jurisdiction.

Appellant’s counsel has not filed a brief in this court; neither has he assigned errors.

Prosecutions for the violations o>f municipal ordinances are in their nature quasi criminal, and on appeal to the appellate court errors must be duly assigned. Casteel v. City of Decatur, 215 Ala. 4, 109 So. 571; Arnold v. City of Mobile, 33 Ala. App. 94, 30…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Casteel v. City of DecaturSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  2. Casteel v. City of DecaturAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Arnold v. City of MobileAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wyatt v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Jackson v. City of MontgomeryAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API