Legal Opinion
Sainberg v. Morton
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided September 10, 1973No. CIV 72-217-PCTPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FREY, District Judge.
On May 3, 1972, the plaintiffs filed an action seeking to set aside a decision of the Secretary of Interior, acting through the Board of Land Appeals, which affirmed a decision of the Bureau of Land Management and the Arizona Land Office declaring plaintiff Sainberg’s mining claim null and void for failure to file a timely answer to the government’s contest complaint. Plaintiffs also seek to have the contest complaint summarily dismissed.
The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Alonzo A. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Ford M. Converse v. Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Henrikson v. UdallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pence v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Pence v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Roberts v. MortonDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1975
- Samedan Oil Corp. v. Cotton Petroleum Corp.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1978
- Wieler v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.