Legal Opinion
San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District v. Gage Canal Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 8, 1964No. Civ. 7171PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, J. *
Plaintiff, a municipal water district, filed an action in condemnation pursuant to California Municipal Water District Act of 1911, to condemn the water rights and certain of the physical properties of defendant-respondent, an incorporated mutual water company.
By way of special defense, defendant company pleaded that there is pending another action filed some 10 months prior to this action, by which the City of Riverside seeks to condemn all of the property plaintiff herein seeks to condemn. This special defense was tried separately before trial of the other issues, and the trial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Scott v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Harrington v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Estate of RadovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- East Bay Municipal Utility District v. KiefferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Bayle-Lacoste & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Big Bear Mun. Water Dist. v. Superior Court of San Bernardino Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Dresser v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Plant Insulation Co. v. Fibreboard Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- City of Crystal Lake v. La Salle National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
- Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control v. City of IndioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.