Jeffry v. Pounds
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRIEDMAN, Acting P. J.
This attorney fee suit is countered by the charge that the plaintiff lawyers breached their professional responsibilities toward their client. Defendants are the client and his new attorney. They appeal from an adverse judgment.
The facts are revealed by a settled statement and by findings of the trial court. Plaintiffs Jeffry, Gibson and Barbour are a law firm. In May 1973 defendant L. J. Pounds was injured in an automobile accident. He had a long acquaintance with Mr. Gibson, asked the latter to represent him and signed an agreement retaining Gibson’s firm.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Cinema 5, Ltd. v. Cinerama, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Lysick v. WalcomCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Anderson v. EatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Santa Clara County Counsel Attorneys Ass'n v. WoodsideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Concat Lp v. Unilever, PlcDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Reena Frailich v. Sandra DisnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.