Legal Opinion

Buckel v. Nunn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 26, 1994No. 91-CV0348 A81299PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants Ron and Dennis Nunn (defendants). She alleged that defendants are vicariously liable for the acts of Steven Rodrigues, doing business as S&S Security and Loss Prevention (S&S Security), and his employee, Richard Rowe, that she claims constituted false imprisonment and intentional infliction of emotional distress. She assigns error to the grant of defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. The trial court ruled that, as a matter of law, plaintiffs vicarious liability claims fail, because Rodrigues and Rowe were independent contractors and not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Amfac Foods, Inc. v. International Systems & Controls Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Henn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Oregon Fisheries Co. v. Elmore Packing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Soderback v. TownsendCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. D'ANGELO v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buckel v. NunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  2. Buckel v. NunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Meritage Homeowners' Association v. The Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API