Legal Opinion

Buckel v. Nunn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 25, 1998No. 91-CV-0348; CA A95293Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiff appeals after the jury rendered a verdict for defendants Ron and Dennis Nunn. Defendants also make two cross-assignments of error, contending that the trial court erred in granting partial summary judgment to plaintiff and in denying their motion for summary judgment that plaintiffs claims are barred as a matter of law. ORCP 47. We affirm.

In 1991, plaintiff brought an action alleging false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress and reckless infliction of emotional distress against Ron Nunn, Dennis Nunn, Steve Rodriguez, doing business as S&S Security, and Richard…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Buckel v. NunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. John N. Sheagren, M.D., P.C. v. AlbrechtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Buckel v. NunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API