Legal Opinion
Soderback v. Townsend
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided May 12, 1982No. A7911-05713, CA A20503PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant American Quasar Petroleum Company (Quasar) in this action for damages arising out of an automobile accident. The issue is whether the trial court was correct in concluding that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that Quasar was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. ORCP 47C. We review the record in the light most, favorable to plaintiff, the party opposing the motion. Forest Grove Brick v. Strickland, 277 Or 81, 87, 559 P2d 502 (1977).
Defendant Townsend was retained by Quasar to negotiate gas leases. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Woody v. WaibelOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Forest Grove Brick Works, Inc. v. StricklandOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- Meskimen v. Larry Angell Salvage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Kowaleski v. KowaleskiOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Knapp v. Standard Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Powell v. TannerAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Reforestation General Contractors, Inc. v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Forest Industries Insurance Exchange v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Moxness v. City of NewportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Norris v. SackettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.