Legal Opinion

D'ANGELO v. Schultz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 8, 1992No. 86-CV-70; CA A66327PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment on a directed verdict on their claim for breach of a contract to purchase an apartment building. This case is before us for the second time. The first time, we dismissed the appeal as to defendant Javoric, affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims for fraudulent and reckless misrepresentations, reversed the summary judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ contract claim and remanded for further proceedings. D’Angelo v. Schultz, 89 Or App 339, 749 P2d 584, aff’d 306 Or 504, 760 P2d 866 (1988). Plaintiffs now assign error, after a retrial, to the trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Hatley v. StaffordOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Paulson v. Western Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Gardner v. MeilingOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Wagner v. Rainier Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lang v. Oregon-Idaho Annual Conference of the United Methodist ChurchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. Buckel v. NunnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Bridge City Family Medical Clinic v. Kent & Johnson, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Hardt v. Columbia PlywoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. Kelley v. Kirkman Group, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API