Legal Opinion

Gray v. Schlapp

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1955No. 35683PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

92 Ga. App. 261 (1955)

88 S.E.2d 536

GRAY

v.

SCHLAPP et al.

35683.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided June 17, 1955.

Fulcher, Fulcher & Hagler, for plaintiff in error.

Bussey & Hardin, John F. Hardin, contra.

NICHOLS, J.

1. "When a court passes upon a motion for a nonsuit it decides only one question, that is, do the allegation and the proof correspond? In sustaining such a motion the court does not hold that the plaintiff is not entitled, under the law, to recover on the facts alleged; neither does the overruling of the motion decide that the plaintiff is entitled under the law to recover. The right…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. McCandless v. ConleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Flewellen v. FlewellenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Barge v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Gray v. SchlappCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Covil v. Robert & Co. AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  2. Yarbrough v. Cantex Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  3. Seal v. AldredgeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Barnes v. DidschuneitCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
  5. McCoy Grocery Company v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API