Legal Opinion

McCoy Grocery Company v. Travelers Indemnity Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 27, 1960No. 38119PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

1. “ ‘When a court passes upon a motion for a non-suit it decides only one question, that is, do the allegations and the proof correspond? In sustaining such a motion the court does not hold that the plaintiff is not entitled, under the law, to recover on the facts alleged; neither does the overruling of the motion decide that the plaintiff is entitled under the law to recover. The right to recover under the facts alleged is not involved in the decision of such a motion. If a plaintiff “proves his case as laid,” he is entitled to prevail as against a nonsuit; but it by means…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. McCandless v. ConleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Flewellen v. FlewellenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Gray v. SchlappCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Barge v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  2. Benton v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  3. Ferguson v. Phoenix Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  4. McCoy Grocery Company v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API