Legal Opinion

Gray v. Schlapp

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 17, 1955No. 35683PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

1. “When a court passes upon a motion for a nonsuit if decides only one question, that is, do the allegation and the proof correspond? In sustaining such a motion the court does not hold that the plaintiff is not entitled, under the law, to recover on the facts alleged; neither does the overruling of the motion decide that the plaintiff is entitled under the law to recover. The right to recover under the facts alleged is not involved in the decision of such a motion. If a plaintiff ‘proves his case as laid,’ he is entitled to prevail as against a nonsuit; but it by no means follows from this…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. McCandless v. ConleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Flewellen v. FlewellenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Barge v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gray v. SchlappCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API