Legal Opinion

Gullickson v. Torkelson Bros., Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1999No. 990004PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark Gulliekson appeals from the judgment of dismissal of the district court. Gulliekson argued Torkelson Brothers, Inc., had breached a duty to him when he was injured on the job. Because there is no evidence of breach of duty, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.

I

[¶ 2] Gulliekson was employed on the Torkelson Brothers, Inc., farm. On December 31, 1993, he was injured when he slipped on the wooden floor of a semitrailer he was inspecting before loading with potatoes. At the time of his injury, Gulliekson was an experienced 36-year-old farm laborer employed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hurt v. FreelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Barsness v. General Diesel & Equipment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Narum v. Faxx Foods, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Diegel v. City of West FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lindenberg v. FolsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Iglehart v. IglehartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Fetch v. QuamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Rogstad v. Dakota Gasification Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Collette v. ClausenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Dinger Ex Rel. Dinger v. Strata Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API