Gullickson v. Torkelson Bros., Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Mark Gulliekson appeals from the judgment of dismissal of the district court. Gulliekson argued Torkelson Brothers, Inc., had breached a duty to him when he was injured on the job. Because there is no evidence of breach of duty, the judgment of the district court is affirmed.
I
[¶ 2] Gulliekson was employed on the Torkelson Brothers, Inc., farm. On December 31, 1993, he was injured when he slipped on the wooden floor of a semitrailer he was inspecting before loading with potatoes. At the time of his injury, Gulliekson was an experienced 36-year-old farm laborer employed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hurt v. FreelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Barsness v. General Diesel & Equipment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Narum v. Faxx Foods, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Diegel v. City of West FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Lindenberg v. FolsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Iglehart v. IglehartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Fetch v. QuamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Rogstad v. Dakota Gasification Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Collette v. ClausenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Dinger Ex Rel. Dinger v. Strata Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.