Legal Opinion

Collette v. Clausen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 20, 2003No. 20030026PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Katie Collette appeals from a summary judgment dismissing with prejudice her action against Robert Clausen (“Clausen”) seeking damages for wrongful death and pain and suffering arising from a snowmobile accident. We conclude Katie Collette failed to present sufficient evidence following a motion for summary judgment to establish each essential element of her claims for negligent entrustment and negligent failure to warn. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In January 1999, Joshua Collette and Clausen decided to go snowmobiling on the Red River (“the river”) in Grand Forks, North Dakota.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hurt v. FreelandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Peterson v. ZerrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Barsness v. General Diesel & Equipment Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Butz v. WernerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Dahlberg v. LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERV. OF NDNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. West v. East Tennessee Pioneer Oil Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Iglehart v. IglehartNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Groleau v. Bjornson Oil Co., Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Beckler v. Bismarck Public School DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. First Union National Bank v. RPB 2, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API