Legal Opinion
Lindenberg v. Folson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 30, 1965No. 8244PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TEIGEN, Judge.
The defendants have separately appealed from an order denying a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and new trial and from the judgment.
The plaintiff seeks to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when her hand and arm were caught and injured in a potato-harvesting machine upon which she was working. She has sued her employer, the defendant Folson, and the manufacturer of the potato-harvesting machine, the defendant Lockwood. The plaintiff’s claims are based on negligence in that her employer failed to provide a safe and suitable machine and that the defendant…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Leonard v. North Dakota Co-Operative Wool Marketing Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
- McGregor v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Levi Ex Rel. Levi v. MontgomeryNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- McCullagh v. FortuneNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
- Lund Ex Rel. Lund v. KnoffNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Andrews v. O'HEARNNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. American Motors Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Kresel v. GieseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Seibel v. Symons CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Schmidt v. Plains Electric, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.