Legal Opinion

Collier v. Dejarnette Supply Co.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 20, 1942No. 14108PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Grice, Justice.

Several parties demurred to the answer of Andrew J. Collier as amended, and the same was stricken. The brief in support of the ruling of the trial court challenges the contention of the plaintiff in error that his answer as amended was' in fact a cross-action, and denies that it was a proceeding as a minority stockholder in behalf of himself and other stockholders against the corporation and its officers; and contends that if it was, no case is made to authorize him so to proceed. It is unnecessary to consider any of the grounds of demurrer except the one which takes the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ray v. Home & Foreign Investment & Agency Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Byrd v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. Josey v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  4. Atlanta Northern Railway Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  5. Johnson v. StancliffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ayers v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  2. Bowles v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  3. Horton v. HarveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  4. Bedenbaugh v. BurginSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Lankford v. MilhollinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API