Legal Opinion
Lankford v. Milhollin
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided July 15, 1948No. 16277PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1. The court did not err in sustaining a demurrer to the amendment to the traverse of the caveat.
2. A cross-action which merely seeks to introduce new and distinct matter not germane to the original issue should be stricken on demurrer.
3. The judgment sustaining the caveat and directing that the notation of lien be canceled was demanded.
No. 16277. JULY 15, 1948. REHEARING DENIED JULY 28, 1948.
Pursuant to a decision of this court in Lankford v.Holton, 195 Ga. 317 (decided January 13, 1943), and by virtue of a decree of the superior court, title to a one-half undivided interest in the tract of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Josey v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Atlanta Northern Railway Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Johnson v. StancliffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Usry v. Hines-Yelton Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Lankford v. HoltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ayers v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Buffington v. McClellandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971