Legal Opinion

Horton v. Harvey

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 10, 1963No. 22088, 22089PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Presiding Justice.

1. The trial court erred in overruling the general demurrers of the defendant. “The office of an injunction being, under the code of this State, merely to restrain and not to compel the performance of an act, this remedy is not available for the purpose of evicting a party from the actual possession of land, the right to which is in dispute between himself and another; and consequently such a result can not be indirectly accomplished by an order restraining the party so in possession ‘from further interfering- with said lot of land, house and crop’ thereon. Such an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ray v. Home & Foreign Investment & Agency Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Burns v. HaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Byrd v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Vaughn v. YawnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  5. Glover v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. BerrymanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Weems v. WeemsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
  4. Horton v. HarveySupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  5. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API