Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co. v. Busey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 2, 1939No. Nos. 28381, 28478PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELCH, V. C. J.

Herein is presented the question of which of two receivers, the one appointed by the district court of Hughes county, and the other appointed by the district court of Tulsa county, is entitled to proceeds from the sale of oil produced from certain premises under oil and gas leases held by Pringle and Marshall, lessees, while labor and materialmen’s lien claims were being foreclosed in the district court of Hughes county. The leased premises were located in Hughes county. Actions to foreclose the liens were commenced in Hughes county, June 5, and June 12, 1933. These actions…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Frank Oil Co. v. Belleview Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  3. Duff v. KeatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Phillips v. Springfield Crude Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Cincinnati, Richmond & Muncie Railroad v. SheraIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. La Bellman v. Gleason & Sanders, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  2. Continental Supply Co. v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  3. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Pubco Petroleum Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Republic Bank & Trust Co. of Tulsa v. Bohmar Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. State v. ShamblinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API