Cincinnati, Richmond & Muncie Railroad v. Shera
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Eandolph Circuit Court; John W. Macy, Judge. Suit by Eddie K. Shera and another against the Cincinnati, Eichmond & Muncie Eailroad. Erom a decree for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
■ Eobinson, P. J. —
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether a person who furnishes coal used as fuel to generate steam for the operation of a steam shovel used by a contractor for excavating and removing earth in the construction of a railroad is given a lien by statute upon the right of way and franchises of the railroad for the coal so furnished and used.
*3161. Section 7265 Burns 1901, Acts 1889, p. 257, §4, provides: “All persons who shall perform work or labor in the way of grading, * * * or who shall per- ‘ form work of any kind in the construction or repair of any railroad, * *…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Richmond & I. Const. Co. v. Richmond, N., I. & B. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Basshor v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Copeland v. Kehoe & RamseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Winslow v. UrquhartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Giant-Powder Co. v. Oregon Pac. Ry. Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1890
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Indianapolis Northern Traction Co. v. BrennanIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Chicago Lumber Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Potter Manufacturing Co. v. A. B. Meyer & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Ward v. YarnelleIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Johnson v. StarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.