Legal Opinion

Gosse v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 9, 1999No. 98-3499PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, P.J.

¶ 1. Robert P. Gosse appeals from an order dismissing his claims against Navistar International Transportation Corporation and Caterpillar, Inc. He argues that the trial court erred by concluding that he could not state a claim for personal injury damages based on Wisconsin's "Lemon Law." He also asserts that the court erred by not allowing him to amend his complaint for a third time. Finally, he argues that the special verdict rendered by the jury was inconsistent. We conclude that the Lemon Law does not permit Gosse's claim for personal injury dam ages and that the trial court properly…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vollmer v. LuetyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. SchumacherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hughes v. Chrysler Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. Frederick v. McCaughtryCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  5. Westfall Ex Rel. Terwilliger v. KottkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Industrial Risk Insurers & Quad Graphics, Inc. v. American Engineering Testing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
  2. Tammi v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. CockrellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
  4. Chariton v. Saturn Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2000
  5. Harvot v. Solo Cup Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API