Legal Opinion

Chariton v. Saturn Corp.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 21, 2000No. 99-0617PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P.J.

¶ 1. This appeal by a car manufacturer who did not comply with the Lemon Law's thirty-day time frame in which to replace the con sumer's vehicle or refund the purchase price is controlled by Church v. Chrysler Corp., 221 Wis. 2d 460, 585 N.W.2d 685 (Ct. App. 1998). There, we held that thirty days means thirty days; a dispute between the consumer and the manufacturer about the amount of refund does not toll the thirty-day period in which the manufacturer must act. The same is true of a dispute over the breadth of a release, as was the situation in this case. Here, Saturn violated the Lemon Law…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Church v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  2. Gosse v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marquez v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Herzberg v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  3. Kiss v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  4. Marquez v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  5. Bcr Trucking, LLC v. Paccar, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API