Legal Opinion

Bolden v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1988No. 53056PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARD, Judge.

Movant appeals from the denial of his Rule 27.26 motion after an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

After a trial before a judge, movant was convicted of first degree robbery and was sentenced to a term of 20 years in prison. We affirmed the conviction on direct appeal. State v. Bolden, 671 S.W.2d 418 (Mo.App.1984). Movant filed a pro se Rule 27.26 motion. Counsel was appointed, and an amended motion was filed. Movant and his trial counsel testified at the evidentiary hearing.

Movant testified he gave the names of two alibi witnesses, Alvin Martindale and Laretta Jones, to his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  3. Richardson v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Hogshooter v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'Shea v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Clayton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API