O'Shea v. State

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Presiding Judge.

Appellant (“Movant”) appeals the denial of post-conviction relief from fifteen forgery convictions. 1 His 60-page amended Rule 29.15 motion asserted more than a dozen claims for relief. The motion court, which also had been the trial court, rejected them all after an evidentiary hearing.

Movant raises three points on appeal. Our review is limited to whether the motion court’s findings and conclusions are clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). This means our consideration of the whole record must firmly and definitely persuade us that a mistake was made. The motion…