Legal Opinion

Young v. NEILL

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1950Published

1Opinion

On Behearing

TOOZE, J.

*176Respondents have filed a petition for rehearing based on the following grounds:

“I
“The court erred in holding that the taking of possession of the premises and the payment of rental is sufficient part performance to take a lease for more than one year outside the operation of the Statute of Frauds.
“II

‘ ‘ The court erred in holding that Everett H. McGee was the authorized agent of Donzella McGee for the purpose of entering into a lease, in the absence of proof of written authority as required by the Statute of Frauds.

“Ill
“The court erred in holding that the parties had…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Young v. NEILLOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Wallace v. ScogginsOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  4. West v. Washington Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Dunis v. DirectorOregon Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API