Legal Opinion
Young v. NEILL
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 5, 1950Published
1Opinion
On Behearing
TOOZE, J.
*176Respondents have filed a petition for rehearing based on the following grounds:
“I
“The court erred in holding that the taking of possession of the premises and the payment of rental is sufficient part performance to take a lease for more than one year outside the operation of the Statute of Frauds.
“II
‘ ‘ The court erred in holding that Everett H. McGee was the authorized agent of Donzella McGee for the purpose of entering into a lease, in the absence of proof of written authority as required by the Statute of Frauds.
“Ill
“The court erred in holding that the parties had…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Young v. NEILLOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Wallace v. ScogginsOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- West v. Washington Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Dunis v. DirectorOregon Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.