Dunis v. Director
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RAND J.
This is a suit to enjoin, an action of forcible entry and detainer and for the specific peivformance of a parol contract for the leasing of real property. It is admitted by the answer that a contract of that kind was actually entered into between plaintiff and defendants, but there is a dispute as to the terms thereof. Plaintiff claims that the lease was to be for a term of three years, while defendants claim that under the lease the plaintiff was to be a tenant from month to month. Both parties admit that defendant was to pay rental for said premises at the rate of $225 per month.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brown v. LordOregon Supreme Court · 1879
- Wallace v. ScogginsOregon Supreme Court · 1889
- Le Vee v. Le VeeOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Ankeny v. BlakleyOregon Supreme Court · 1903
- Barrett v. SchleichOregon Supreme Court · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Craswell v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Walker v. MACKEYOregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Heskett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.