Legal Opinion

Dunis v. Director

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1927PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAND J.

This is a suit to enjoin, an action of forcible entry and detainer and for the specific peivformance of a parol contract for the leasing of real property. It is admitted by the answer that a contract of that kind was actually entered into between plaintiff and defendants, but there is a dispute as to the terms thereof. Plaintiff claims that the lease was to be for a term of three years, while defendants claim that under the lease the plaintiff was to be a tenant from month to month. Both parties admit that defendant was to pay rental for said premises at the rate of $225 per month.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brown v. LordOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Wallace v. ScogginsOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Le Vee v. Le VeeOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Ankeny v. BlakleyOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Barrett v. SchleichOregon Supreme Court · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Craswell v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Howland v. Iron Fireman Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Walker v. MACKEYOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Howland v. Iron Fireman Mfg. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Heskett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API