Legal Opinion

Foothill Ditch Co. v. Wallace Ranch Water Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 31, 1938No. Civ. 1828; Civ. 1829PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This opinion covers two consolidated actions to recover for services rendered in diverting water from the Kaweah River and transporting it through a conduit for a distance of about four miles to diversion points of Wallace Ranch Water Company. The two actions are identical except as to the time during which the water was diverted and transported and the amounts sought to be recovered. The Foothill Ditch Company had judgments in both actions and Wallace Ranch Water Company has appealed. The causes were tried together and are presented on a single reporter’s transcript. They have been…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. EshlemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Ethel D. Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Napa Valley Electric Co. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. Truck Owners & Shippers, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Parker v. Shell Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Anderson v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. Independent Laundry v. Railroad Com.California Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. Tabata v. MuraneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API