Legal Opinion

Skelton v. Dill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1911No. 1227PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Okfuskee County; John B. Pattersron, Special Judge. Action by William H. Dill against L. S. Skelton and W. E. Whitman. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Skelton brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROSSER, C.

This is a suit by William H. Dill, defendant in error, hereinafter called plaintiff, against L. S. Skelton, plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, and W. E. Whitman, to recover certain lands described in plaintiff’s petition. The lands were the allotment of Archie Hamby, dedeceased, who was the son of Archie H. Hamby, a noncitizen, and Dora Hamby, a member of the Creek Tribe of Indians. Archie Hamby died on the 26th of July, A. D. 1901, leaving surviving him his father, mother, three brothers, and a sister. The record is silent as to when this land was selected…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Hurst v. SawyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
  3. Shulthis v. MacDougalU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Oklahoma · 1907
  4. Goree v. WadsworthSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Owen v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McDonald v. RalstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Harvey v. Benmo Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Boxley v. ScottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API