Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Ralston
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 27, 1916No. 7548PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error from District Court, Creek County; Ernest B. Hughes, Judge. Action by John F. Ralston against Florence McDonald, A. D. McDonell, and F. A. Rittenhouse. Judgment for plaintiff, and the defendants McDonald and Rittenhouse bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
MATHEWlS, O.
This is an action to determine conflicting claims to the allotment of a deceased minor Creek citizen. The case was submitted in the trial court upon the following agreed statement of facts:
“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties hereto, by their respective attorneys, that the facts in the above case are as follows, to wit:
“First. That the plaintiff John Ralston, and the defendant Florence McDonald were in the year 1900, and prior thereto, husband and wife; that they were married on the 14th day of June, 1897; and that there was born to them in…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Sizemore v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Godfrey v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Barnett v. WaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Jefferson v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Privett v. RentieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Hamilton v. BahnsenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- King v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- Israel v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.