Legal Opinion

Boxley v. Scott

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 9, 1917No. 7617PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from District Court, Hughes County; R. W. Higgins, Assigned Judge. Action by E. M. Scott against J. D. Boxley and Eranklin Chaney. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff, E. M. Scott, and against the defendant, J. D. Boxley, and against the defendant, Eranklin Chaney, in part. Defendant Boxley brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

DAVIS, C.

Jimmie Bighead was a Creek Indian of the one-half blood. His name appears on the approved rolls of the Creek Nation opposite No. 7521. Under the Original Creek and Supplemental Treaties there was duly allotted to him the southwest quarter of section 23, township 6 north, rangg 8 east, 160 acres of land in what was then the Creek Nation of the Indian Territory, now Hughes county, state of Oklahoma, the northwest quarter of the southwest quarter of which was designated and allotted to him as his homestead. The proper allotment certificates and patents to said land were duly…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Shulthis v. McDougalSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Heckman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Tiger v. Western Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Mullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Jefferson v. WinklerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dowell v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API