Legal Opinion

Utah Farm Bureau Ins. Co. v. Chugg

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 1957No. 8621PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WADE, Justice.

The Utah Farm Bureau Insurance Company brought a suit for a declaratory judgment to determine its rights under an automobile insurance policy it had issued to Rex K. Chugg, appellant herein. This policy contained an exclusion clause which suspended all coverage when the car was being operated by a driver who was “under the influence of alcohol.”

Willard A. Larsen, one of the defendants in this suit, had commenced an action against Rex K. Chugg for personal and property damages arising out of an automobile accident. One of the terms of the policy issued by the Utah Farm Bureau…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Novak v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
  4. State v. WelthaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  5. Whitmore v. Murray CityUtah Supreme Court · 1944

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Lessenhop v. NortonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  2. Dixon v. StewartUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Connolly v. Great Basin Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Jones v. TalbotIdaho Supreme Court · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API