Legal Opinion
Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District v. Zinzer
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 29, 1942No. Civ. 6684PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEIRUP, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to a parcel.of land in Shasta County described as follows :
“Commencing at the southerly end of the dam of the Anderson, Cottonwood Irrigation District at the confluence of the Sacramento River and the intake canal of said District; thence in an easterly direction, following the water line of the Sacramento River to the point of the confluence of the Sacramento River and the Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District Canal; thence in a general westerly direction along the northerly bank of said Canal to the point of beginning;…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Turlock Irrigation Dist. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District v. KlukkertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Reclamation District No. 551 v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Murray v. Tulare Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Smart v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- California Water Service Co. v. Edward Sidebotham & Son, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Leoke v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967