Legal Opinion

Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District v. Zinzer

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 29, 1942No. Civ. 6684PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEIRUP, J. pro tem.

Plaintiff brought this action to quiet title to a parcel.of land in Shasta County described as follows :

“Commencing at the southerly end of the dam of the Anderson, Cottonwood Irrigation District at the confluence of the Sacramento River and the intake canal of said District; thence in an easterly direction, following the water line of the Sacramento River to the point of the confluence of the Sacramento River and the Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District Canal; thence in a general westerly direction along the northerly bank of said Canal to the point of beginning;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Turlock Irrigation Dist. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Anderson-Cottonwood Irrigation District v. KlukkertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Reclamation District No. 551 v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Murray v. Tulare Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Smart v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. California Water Service Co. v. Edward Sidebotham & Son, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Leoke v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API