Legal Opinion

Cameron v. Ah Quong

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1908No. Civ. No. 437PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County, and from an order denying a new trial. ,W. B. Wallace, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Action in ejectment. The plaintiff alleges ownership of the lands in dispute and ouster by the defendant, and prays for restitution of said premises, for damages for withholding the same and for the sum of $1,750 as the value of the rents and profits from January, 1898, to and including a portion of the year 1903.

The defendant, Ah Quong, answering the complaint, specifically denies the material averments thereof, and then pleads the bar of the statute of limitations.

Chin Shin intervened, and as a first cause of action sets up title to the lands in dispute by adverse possession, and alleges…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Spect v. SpectCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Booth v. HoskinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Brandt v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. De Cazara v. OreñaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Hopkins v. Contra Costa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Slaughter v. Goldberg, Bowen & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1915
  2. Cameron v. Ah QuongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Priola v. PaulinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Berryman v. QuinlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Mazarredo v. GarcíaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API