Legal Opinion
Priola v. Paulino
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 3, 1977No. Civ. 38919PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
Plaintiffs, who are respectively the three minor children and the husband of Geraldine Priola, who was injured on March 28, 1973, in an automobile accident allegedly caused by the negligence of the defendants, have appealed from an order dismissing their complaint in which each sought damages for loss of consortium. The defendants demurred to the complaint and moved to strike it on the ground that the husband’s action for loss of consortium was barred by the statute of limitations because it was not filed until May 12, 1975, more than one year after the wife was injured, and on…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Budd v. NixenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Berman v. AllanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- Miller v. Lakeside Village Condominium Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Bennight v. Western Auto Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Sklar v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.