Legal Opinion
Berkowitz v. Kasparewicz
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 13, 1936PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAvert, J.
This action was brought by the plaintiffs as holders to recover the balance claimed to be due on an instalment note against Konstanty Kasparewicz, maker, and The Phoenix Finance Corporation, indorser. The maker suffered a default for failure to appear and the case was afterward brought to trial against the indorser; judgment was rendered for the plaintiff to recover against both defendants $1268 with interest from April 25th, 1932, a total of $1520.33, and the defendant The Phoenix Finance Corporation has appealed.
The facts found by the court were as follows: On October 25th, 1926, the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rosenthal v. State Bar Examining CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Lockwood v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1847
- Griffin v. ReillyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- State Ex Rel. McClure v. NorthropSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Hartford Realization Co. v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Schaller v. Roadside Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Capital City Motors, Inc. v. Thomas W. Garland, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- Cassiani v. BellinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- Schaeffer v. SchaefferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Melvin Gelman v. Public National BankCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.