Legal Opinion

Ruckdeschel v. Howell

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1940No. Appeal, 84PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

On August 24, 1937, the Caskin School, a Pennsylvania corporation, executed a promissory note to its own order, in the sum of $8,950 payable 90 days later at the Central-Penn National Bank of Philadelphia. Following the school’s endorsement, there appeared in order the following endorsements: Joshua Z. Howell (the appellant here), Paul Loder, Richard J. Hamilton and Fred W. Brill. The last named endorser died on October 23, 1937, and his executors are the plaintiffs below and the appellees here.

On the due date of the note, the bank above named, being the then…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pender v. CookSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Enterprise Brewing Co. v. CanningMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Shea v. VaheyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  4. Lewis v. MonahanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Bayliss Ex Rel. Bowles v. LeeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kroon v. MaxwellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API