Legal Opinion
Kroon v. Maxwell
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 17, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 36134PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRAFT, District Judge.
This is an action upon a promissory note. The plaintiff, a New Jersey citizen, is assignee of the note.
Defendants Lloyd R. Maxwell and Caroline, his wife, citizens of Pennsylvania, are two of the makers of the note in suit. This instrument, in the face amount of $50,000, was originally executed in favor of the Cinnaminson Bank and Trust Company of Riverton, New Jersey (now known as the Garden State Bank), on or about December -31, 1962, by Maxwell Sales & Engineering Company1 (Maxwell Sales), Sherman Car Wash Equipment Company2 (Sherman) and Lloyd R. Maxwell,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Systems Incorporated, a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Bridge Electronics Company, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Ruckdeschel v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rollins v. LeiboldAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
- Fithian v. JamarCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Nagle v. LaSalle National BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1979
- Sherman Car Wash Equipment Co. v. MaxwellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
- Kroon v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.