Legal Opinion

Estate of Bayliss Ex Rel. Bowles v. Lee

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1984No. 15816PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice:

In this case, we are asked to apply either the doctrine of res judicata or principles of collateral estoppel to reverse the circuit court’s judgment.

The Estate of J.M.H. Bayliss brought a civil action based on contribution to recover on what it claimed was a joint indebtedness owed by the plaintiff’s decedent Bayliss and the defendant, Rolfe Lee, which totaled $94,846.22. Bayliss had during his lifetime paid the entire amount.

The underlying obligation arose as a result of Bayliss and Lee being shareholders and directors in a corporation which developed a motel complex near…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Conley v. SpillersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Sitzes v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Sydenstricker v. Unipunch Products, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bluefield Supply Co. v. Frankel's Appliances, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1965

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Board of Education v. Zando, Martin & Milstead, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mildred L.M. v. John O.F.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Wehner v. WeinsteinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Miami Coal Co., Inc. v. HudsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Starr v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API