Legal Opinion

Pender v. Cook

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1930No. Appeal, 4PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Kephaet,

Stephens made a note of $10,000 payable to Pender; it was endorsed and the proceeds used for Cook’s benefit. Both Stephens and Pender were admittedly accomodation parties for Cook. The note was not paid at maturity by Cook, and a new note was given directly to the bank by Pender, as maker; at the same time, Stephens, the maker of the first note, and Cook jointly gave to Pender a note in like amount. Pender was required to pay the second note because of Cook’s bankruptcy, and sued Stephens and Cook on the third note. Stephens interposed the defense that there was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. Delaware County Trust, Safe Deposit & Title Insurance v. HaserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
  3. Thompson v. SchochSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Russ v. SadlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
  5. Wolf v. HostetterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Speier v. MichelsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. La Rocca TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Allinger v. MelvinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Badler v. L. Gillarde Sons Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Brandolini v. Grand Lodge of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API