Legal Opinion

Stolpe v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 15, 1996No. 95-477 CPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Introduction

WIESE, Judge.

Plaintiff, Carol A Stolpe, claims entitlement to a survivor annuity under the military’s Survivor Benefit Plan (“Plan”). Plaintiffs husband, Captain John Stolpe, now deceased, retired from the Public Health Service in 1984 and, at that time, elected not to provide a survivor annuity for his wife. Plaintiffs basic contention in this suit is that her husband’s election not to participate in the Plan was invalid because the Government failed to comply with the statutory provision that requires spousal notice and counseling before a member of the armed forces may opt out…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jewell M. Hart v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  2. August Gava, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Barber ex rel. Barber v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
  4. Ellen M. Kelly v. The United States, Rosemary J. McCarthy v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Helen Passaro, Individually and as of the Estate of Ramon Passaro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Geo-Seis Helicopters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API