Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Stegen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1968PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMengler, J.

(Pro Tempore).

Plaintiff appeals from an order granting a new trial as to defendant Stegen and from a judgment for defendant Chambers. The wrongful death action arose out of a three-ear collision. The action was tried to a jury which returned a verdict for the plaintiff against defendant Stegen, and for defendant Chambers. Judgment was entered upon the verdict February 7, 1967. The order granting a new trial was entered on March 28, 1967.

The pertinent facts are as follows: The defendant Stegen’s ear stopped, or was in the process of stopping, in the right lane of Interstate 5 near the Albany…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Young v. Crown Zellerbach Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Krening v. FlandersOregon Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Beglau v. AlbertusOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Baker v. EnglishOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. DoernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. Landolt v. Flame, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Martin Engineering Co., Inc. v. OptonOregon Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API