Legal Opinion

Bartholomew v. Heyman Properties, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 4, 1955No. Civ. A. 138PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLedwich, P. J.

Plaintiff, a woman over 18 years of age, alleges in her complaint that she was employed by defendant as manager, janitor and parking-lot attendant of an apartment house from March 17, 1953, to about November 17,1953, and that during that period she rendered services to the defendant at its special instance and request for at least 86 hours per week as such employee. She alleged she was entitled to be paid at the minimum wage of 75 cents per hour for the first 48 hours’ work each week, and at time and a half, or $1.12% per hour, for 38 hours’ overtime work each week. After allowing credit to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Norwood v. JuddCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. McAllister v. DrapeauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Miller v. California Roofing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pierce v. AnagnostakisUtah Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API